## 1 Evolution equations and positivity

To set the stage, we start with a reminder about linear evolution equations whose solutions are positive whenever the initial value is.

### Linear ODEs and positivity

For a matrix $A∈R_{d×d}$, the linear and autonomous initial value problem

where $u_{0}∈R_{d}$, is well-known to be solved by the function

We say that the matrix family $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ is *positive* if $e_{tA}u_{0}≥0$ for all $t∈[0,∞)$ whenever $u_{0}≥0$;
equivalently, $e_{tA}≥0$ for all $t∈[0,∞)$.
Here, we use the notation $≥0$ for a vector or a matrix to say that all its entries are $≥0$.

**Remark 1****.** There is some terminological inconsistency in the literature with respect to this notion: in matrix analysis and in some parts of PDE theory, it is common to use the word *non-negativity*; we use the notion *positivity* instead, which is more common in functional analysis.

To get an intuition for this concept, it is useful to recall that positivity of the matrix exponential function is easy to characterise in terms of $A$.

**Theorem 2**

**.**

*For $A∈R_{d×d}$, the family $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ is positive if and only if every off-diagonal entry of $A$ is $≥0$.
*

Proof. “$⇒$” For indices $j=k$, one has

where $e_{j},e_{k}∈R_{d}$ are the canonical unit vectors and $⟨⋅,⋅⟩$ denotes the standard inner product on $R_{d}$.

“$⇐$” By assumption, one has, for a sufficiently large number $c≥0$, the inequality $A+cid≥0$, and hence

for all $t∈[0,∞)$, where the inequality at the end follows from the series expansion of the matrix exponential function. ∎

A typical situation where positivity of matrix exponential functions occurs is the study of Markov processes on finite state spaces.

**Example 3****.** Assume that all off-diagonal entries of $A∈R_{d×d}$ are $≥0$ and that all rows of $A$ sum up to $0$.
Then $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ is positive, and the vector $1∈R_{d}$ whose entries are all equal to $1$ satisfies $A1=0$ and thus $e_{tA}1=1$ for all $t∈[0,∞)$.
This shows that each of the matrices $e_{tA}$, $t≥0$, is row stochastic, so $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ describes a continuous-time Markov process on the finite state space ${1,…,d}$.

### Infinite-dimensional equations

In infinite dimensions, we are still interested in initial value problems of the form

but this time, $u_{0}$ is an element of a Banach space $E$, and $A:E⊇dom(A)→E$ is a linear operator which is defined on a vector subspace $dom(A)$ of $E$.
The initial value problem is well-posed if and only if $A$ is a *generator* of a *$C_{0}$-semigroup*$(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$.
Such a $C_{0}$-semigroup is a family of bounded linear operators on $E$ which is a suitable infinite-dimensional substitute of the matrix exponential function and has similar properties, but it is not given by an exponential series in general.
The solution $u$ to the initial value problem is then given, again, by the formula $u(t)=e_{tA}u_{0}$ for $t∈[0,∞)$.
The generator and the $C_{0}$-semigroup determine each other uniquely, and the relation between semigroup and generator can in general be expressed by the formula

The following notion will be used several times later on. For a linear operator $A:E⊇dom(A)→X$ on a Banach space $X$, the quantity

where $σ(A)$ denotes the spectrum of $A$, is called the *spectral bound of $A$*.
If $A$ generates a $C_{0}$-semigroup, then $s(A)<∞$ (see [20
K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations.
Grad. Texts in Math. 194, Springer, New York (2000)
, Theorem II.1.10 (ii)]).
More information about $C_{0}$-semigroup theory can be found, for instance, in the monographs [31
A. Pazy, Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations.
Appl. Math. Sci. 44, Springer, New York (1983)
, 20
K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations.
Grad. Texts in Math. 194, Springer, New York (2000)
].

Let us briefly illustrate the concept of a $C_{0}$-semigroup by two very classical examples.

**Examples 4****.** (a)
Let $p∈(1,∞)$ and let the operator $A$ be the Laplace operator on the space $L_{p}(R_{n})$, i.e.

Then $A$ generates a $C_{0}$-semigroup $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ on $L_{p}(R_{n})$ that is given by the formula

for $u_{0}∈L_{p}(R_{n})$ and $x∈R_{n}$.
The semigroup is called the *heat semigroup* since it describes the solutions to the heat equation

Similar observations can be made on the space $L_{1}(R_{n})$, but the domain of the Laplace operator cannot be chosen to be a Sobolev space in that case, due to the lack of elliptic regularity.

(b) Let $p∈[1,∞)$ and let the operator $A$ be the negative first derivative on $L_{p}(0,∞)$, given by

Then $A$ generates the so-called *right shift semigroup*$(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ on $L_{p}(0,∞)$ given by

for $u_{0}∈L_{p}(0,∞)$.
The mapping $u:[0,∞)∋t↦e_{tA}u_{0}∈L_{p}(0,∞)$ is a so-called *mild solution* to the transport equation

see [20 K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations. Grad. Texts in Math. 194, Springer, New York (2000) , Definition II.6.3] for the definition of mild solutions. This example is an easy illustration of the general principle that boundary conditions of a PDE are encoded in the domain of the corresponding operator $A$.

### Positive C₀-semigroups

In order to discuss *positive*$C_{0}$-semigroups, one needs an order structure on the underlying Banach space $E$.
This can be for instance a partial order induced by a general closed convex cone, or more specifically the order structure of a Banach lattice.
To facilitate the exposition here, we will restrict our attention to the illustrative case of function spaces, most importantly to $L_{p}$-spaces (over $σ$-finite measure spaces).

For a function $f∈L_{p}$, we write $f≥0$ to indicate that $f(ω)≥0$ for almost all $ω$.
In accordance with the terminology used above, we call a function $f$*positive* if it satisfies $f≥0$.
A $C_{0}$-semigroup $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ on $L_{p}$ is called *positive* if $e_{tA}u_{0}≥0$ for all $t∈[0,∞)$ whenever $u_{0}≥0$.
Equivalently, each of the operators $e_{tA}$ is positive – which we denote by $e_{tA}≥0$ – in the sense that it maps positive functions to positive functions.

We have already encountered two examples of positive $C_{0}$-semigroups: as is easy to see, both semigroups in Examples 4 are positive.

## 2 Positivity for large times

Let us now proceed to a more surprising situation, where positive initial values lead to solutions which might change sign at first, but again become – and stay – positive for sufficiently large times. In this section, we illustrate by means of two easy examples that this kind of behaviour can indeed occur; a more systematic account is presented in the subsequent section.

### A matrix example

Let us start with a simple three-dimensional example.

**Example 5****.** Consider the orthonormal basis $B$ of $R_{3}$ consisting of the three vectors

Let $A∈R_{3×3}$ be such that its representation matrix with respect to the basis $B$ is given by

i.e., we let $A=VRV_{−1}$, where $V∈R_{3×3}$ consists of the columns $v_{1},v_{2},v_{3}$. A direct computation shows that $A$ has some strictly negative off-diagonal entries, so $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ is not positive according to Theorem 2. On the other hand, $A$ has the eigenvalue $0$ (with eigenvector $v_{1}$) as well as the further eigenvalues $−1±i$, so $e_{tA}$ converges to the matrix $v_{1}⋅v_{1}$, whose entries are all equal to $1/3$, as $t→∞$; this shows that $e_{tA}$ is a positive matrix for all sufficiently large times $t$.

### A fourth order PDE

Let us now discuss an infinite-dimensional example where eventual positivity occurs.

**Example 6****.** Let us consider the biharmonic heat equation with periodic boundary conditions on $L_{2}(0,1)$.
It is given by

where $A:L_{2}(0,1)⊇dom(A)→L_{2}(0,1)$ has domain

and is given by $Av=−v_{(4)}$ for each $v∈dom(A)$.
The $C_{0}$-semigroup $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ is not positive; this can for instance be seen by associating a sesquilinear form to $−A$ and using the so-called *Beurling–Deny criterion* [30
E. M. Ouhabaz, Analysis of heat equations on domains.
London Math. Soc. Monogr. Ser. 31, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2005)
, Corollary 2.18].

However, we can prove positivity for large times. To this end, note that the operator $A$ is self-adjoint, and its spectrum consists of isolated eigenvalues only since $dom(A)$ embeds compactly into $L_{2}(0,1)$. The largest eigenvalue of $A$ is $0$, and the constant function $1$ spans the corresponding eigenspace. Hence we conclude, for instance from the spectral theorem for self-adjoint operators with compact resolvent, that

for each $u_{0}∈L_{2}(0,1)$ as $t→∞$. Since $A$ is self-adjoint, the operators $e_{tA}$ have the property that for $t>0$ they map $L_{2}(0,1)$ into $dom(A)$ and thus into $L_{∞}(0,1)$. Moreover, they are even continuous from $L_{2}(0,1)$ to $L_{∞}(0,1)$ (this follows for instance from the closed graph theorem), so for $u_{0}∈L_{2}(0,1)$, we even have

as $t→∞$, where the convergence takes place with respect to the norm in $L_{∞}(0,1)$. This implies that if $u_{0}≥0$, then $e_{tA}u_{0}≥0$ for all sufficiently large times $t$.

## 3 A systematic theory

After the previous ad hoc examples, we now present a few excerpts of a more systematic account of eventual positivity.

### Eventually positive matrix semigroups

Example 5 already gives quite a straightforward idea of how to obtain a sufficient condition for a matrix exponential function to be eventually positive: if a matrix $A∈R_{d×d}$ has a simple real eigenvalue that dominates the real parts of all other eigenvalues and if the corresponding eigenvectors of $A$ and the transposed matrix $A_{T}$ have strictly positive entries only, then we expect $e_{tA}$ to be positive – and in fact to even have strictly positive entries only – for all sufficiently large $t$. A bit more surprising is the Perron–Frobenius-like fact that the converse implication also holds. This was proved by Noutsos and Tsatsomeros in [29 D. Noutsos and M. J. Tsatsomeros, Reachability and holdability of nonnegative states. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30, 700–712 (2008) , Theorem 3.3], who thus obtained the following theorem (in a slightly different form; see [17 D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually positive semigroups of linear operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 433, 1561–1593 (2016) , Theorem 6.1] for the following version of the result).

**Theorem 7**

**.**

*For a matrix $A∈R_{d×d}$, the following assertions are equivalent.*

*There exists a time*$t_{0}≥0$*such that all entries of*$e_{tA}$*are strictly positive for all*$t>t_{0}$*.**The spectral bound*$s(A)$*is a geometrically simple eigenvalue of*$A$*and strictly larger than the real part of every other eigenvalue of*$A$*. Moreover, both*$A$*and*$A_{T}$*have a strictly positive eigenvector for*$s(A)$*, respectively.*

Here, a *strictly positive* vector means a vector whose entries are all strictly positive.

### Individual vs. uniform behaviour

In infinite dimensions, there is a subtlety that we have not properly discussed yet.
Let $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ be a $C_{0}$-semigroup on a function space $E$.
If, for every $0≤u_{0}∈E$, there exists a time $t_{0}≥0$ such that $e_{tA}u_{0}≥0$ for all $t≥t_{0}$, it is natural to call the semigroup *individually eventually positive* since $t_{0}$ might depend on $u_{0}$.
If in addition $t_{0}$ can be chosen to be independent of $u_{0}$, then we call the semigroup *uniformly eventually positive*.

In finite dimensions, the two concepts can be easily seen to coincide (just apply the semigroup to all canonical unit vectors), but in infinite dimensions, there exist semigroups which are individually but not uniformly eventually positive [17 D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually positive semigroups of linear operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 433, 1561–1593 (2016) , Examples 5.7 and 5.8].

### Conditions for eventual positivity in infinite dimensions

The arguments given in Example 6 show individual eventual positivity of the semigroup, and the same argument can easily be generalised to a more abstract setting.
There is one important issue to note, though: if the leading eigenfunction is not bounded away from $0$, but might be equal to $0$ on the boundary of the underlying domain (as in the case of Dirichlet boundary conditions), then it no longer suffices for the argument that $e_{1⋅A}L_{2}$ be contained in $L_{∞}$; instead, one needs the condition that every vector in $e_{1⋅A}L_{2}$ is dominated by a multiple of the leading eigenfunction.
This property is closely related to Sobolev embedding theorems, and can be used to give a characterisation of a certain *strong* version of individual eventual positivity that is reminiscent of Theorem 7.

On the other hand, giving conditions for uniform rather than individual eventual positivity is more subtle. It requires a domination condition not only on the vectors in the image of $e_{1⋅A}L_{2}$, but also on the image of the dual operator. If the semigroup is self-adjoint, though, this dual condition becomes redundant and one ends up with the following sufficient condition for uniform eventual positivity.

**Theorem 8**

**.**

*Let $(Ω,μ)$ be a $σ$-finite measure space, let $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ be a self-adjoint $C_{0}$-semigroup on $L_{2}:−L_{2}(Ω,μ)$ which leaves the set of real-valued functions invariant, and let $u∈L_{2}$ be a function which is strictly positive almost everywhere.
Assume that the following assumptions hold.*

*The spectral bound*$s(A)$*is a simple eigenvalue of*$A$*, and the corresponding eigenspace contains a function*$v$*satisfying*$v≥cu$*for a number*$c>0$*.**There exists a time*$t_{1}≥0$*such that the modulus of every vector in*$e_{t_{1}A}L_{2}$*is dominated by a multiple of*$u$*.*

*Then $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ is uniformly eventually positive.*

The really interesting part in the conclusion of the theorem is the word *uniformly*, and this is more involved than the argument presented in Example 6.
Two different proofs of the theorem are known:
the first one is based on an eigenvalue estimate and the theory of Hilbert–Schmidt operators [24
J. Glück, Invariant sets and long time behaviour of operator semigroups.
PhD thesis, Universität Ulm (2016)
, Theorem 10.2.1] (the assumptions in the reference are slightly different, but the same argument works under the assumptions presented above); the second one employs a duality argument and can thus be generalised to non-self-adjoint semigroups on more general spaces [14
D. Daners and J. Glück, A criterion for the uniform eventual positivity of operator semigroups.
Integral Equations Operator Theory 90, Paper No. 46 (2018)
, Theorem 3.3 and Corollary 3.5].
This reference also shows that the theorem can be adjusted to even yield a characterisation of a stronger type of eventual positivity.

Theorem 8 implies the non-trivial observation that the semigroup in Example 6 is even uniformly eventually positive.

### Spectral properties

Positive semigroups are known to have surprising structural properties, in particular with regard to their spectrum. For some of these properties, it can be shown that they are shared by eventually positive semigroups, though some of the proofs are different from the classical proofs for the positive case. Here are two examples.

If the spectrum of the generator $A$ of an individually eventually positive semigroup is non-empty, then it follows that the spectral bound $s(A)$ is itself a spectral value [17 D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually positive semigroups of linear operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 433, 1561–1593 (2016) , Theorem 7.6].

For uniformly eventually positive semigroups on $L_{p}$-spaces, the spectral bound $s(A)$ coincides with the so-called

*growth bound*of the semigroup (see e.g. [20 K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations. Grad. Texts in Math. 194, Springer, New York (2000) , Definition I.5.6] for a definition); this was recently shown by Vogt [35 H. Vogt, Stability of uniformly eventually positive C0-semigroups on Lp-spaces. arXiv:2110.02310v2 (2021) , Theorem 2]. The same can be shown, even for individually eventually positive semigroups, on spaces of continuous functions [6 S. Arora and J. Glück, Stability of (eventually) positive semigroups on spaces of continuous functions. arXiv:2110.04581v1 (2021) , Theorem 4].

More results on the spectrum of eventually positive $C_{0}$-semigroups can be found in [5 S. Arora and J. Glück, Spectrum and convergence of eventually positive operator semigroups. Semigroup Forum 103, 791–811 (2021) ].

## 4 More examples

### The biharmonic heat equation

Example 6 can be adjusted in the following way: we replace the unit interval with a ball $B$ in $R_{d}$, the fourth derivative with the square $Δ_{2}$ of the Laplace operator, and the periodic boundary conditions with so-called *clamped plate* boundary conditions, which require both the function and its normal derivative to vanish at the boundary.
On $L_{2}(B)$, this yields the operator $A$ given by

where $H_{4}(B)$ and $H_{0}(B)$ denote Sobolev spaces.
The operator $A$ is self-adjoint and has negative spectral bound.
It thus generates a $C_{0}$-semigroup $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ which describes the solutions to the so-called *bi-harmonic heat equation*

We have the following result.

**Theorem 9**

**.**

*The bi-harmonic heat semigroup $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ on $L_{2}(B)$ is uniformly eventually positive.*

Rough outline of the proof. Since $B$ is a ball, the inverse operator $(−A)_{−1}$ – or rather its integral kernel, the so-called *Green function* of $A$ – can be computed explicitly, and this was in fact done by Boggio over a hundred years ago [9
T. Boggio, Sulle funzioni di Green d’ordine m.
Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 20, 97–135 (1905)
] (see also [27
H.-C. Grunau and G. Sweers, The maximum principle and positive principal eigenfunctions for polyharmonic equations.
In Reaction diffusion systems (Trieste, 1995), Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. 194, Dekker, New York, 163–182 (1998)
, Section 2]).
The explicit formula shows that $(−A)_{−1}$ maps positive functions to positive functions, and even strengthens their positivity in an appropriate sense.
Hence, by a Krein–Rutman type result, we obtain that the leading eigenfunction of $A$ is strictly positive inside $B$.
Given the specific boundary conditions, it is not too surprising that we also get that assumptions (1) and (2) of Theorem 8 are satisfied if we choose $u=d_{2}$, where $d:B→[0,∞)$ describes the distance of each point in $B$ to the boundary $∂B$.
Hence, Theorem 8 gives the desired eventual positivity.
∎

For more details, we refer to [16 D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually and asymptotically positive semigroups on Banach lattices. J. Differential Equations 261, 2607–2649 (2016) , second subsection of Section 6] and [14 D. Daners and J. Glück, A criterion for the uniform eventual positivity of operator semigroups. Integral Equations Operator Theory 90, Paper No. 46 (2018) , third subsection of Section 4]. A few comments are in order.

**Remark 10****.** (a)
The argument sketched above breaks down for general domains in $R_{d}$, since the inverse $(−A)_{−1}$ need no longer be positive in this case.
This is a very well-studied topic in PDE theory; see for instance the surveys [33
G. Sweers, When is the first eigenfunction for the clamped plate equation of fixed sign?
In Proceedings of the USA-Chile Workshop on Nonlinear Analysis (Viña del Mar-Valparaiso, 2000), Electron. J. Differ. Equ. Conf. 6, Southwest Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX, 285–296 (2001)
] by Sweers and [11
A. Dall’Acqua and G. Sweers, On domains for which the clamped plate system is positivity preserving.
In Partial differential equations and inverse problems, Contemp. Math. 362, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 133–144 (2004)
] by Dall’Acqua and Sweers for more information.

(b) However, if we replace $B$ with a domain which is sufficiently close to a ball, we still obtain the same result. The main point here is that positivity of $(−A)_{−1}$ or, under slightly larger perturbations, at least positivity of the leading eigenfunction of $A$ remains true on such domains as shown by Grunau and Sweers in [27 H.-C. Grunau and G. Sweers, The maximum principle and positive principal eigenfunctions for polyharmonic equations. In Reaction diffusion systems (Trieste, 1995), Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. 194, Dekker, New York, 163–182 (1998) , Theorem 5.2]. So Theorem 9 holds on this more general class of domains, too.

(c) Theorem 9 remains true on general $L_{p}$-spaces rather than on $L_{2}$; see for instance [14 D. Daners and J. Glück, A criterion for the uniform eventual positivity of operator semigroups. Integral Equations Operator Theory 90, Paper No. 46 (2018) , Theorem 4.4].

(d)
If we replace the clamped plate boundary conditions with so-called *hinged* boundary conditions, which require $u=Δu=0$ on the boundary, the situation becomes much easier because the operator can then be written as minus the square of the Dirichlet Laplace operator.
In this case, we have eventual positivity of the semigroup on general domains; on the space of continuous functions, this example is worked out in [16
D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually and asymptotically positive semigroups on Banach lattices.
J. Differential Equations 261, 2607–2649 (2016)
, Theorem 6.1].

### Non-local boundary conditions

Let us now go back to the unit interval and consider the Laplace operator, i.e. the second spatial derivative. If we impose local boundary conditions – such as for instance Dirichlet, Neumann or mixed Dirichlet and Neumann boundary condition, the Laplace operator is well-known to generate a positive semigroup (also on general domains in arbitrary dimension); see for instance [30 E. M. Ouhabaz, Analysis of heat equations on domains. London Math. Soc. Monogr. Ser. 31, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2005) , Corollary 4.3]. However, let us consider an example of non-local boundary conditions instead. More specifically, we consider the operator $A$ on $L_{2}(0,1)$ given by

This is a self-adjoint operator; the operator, and in particular its relation to the Dirichlet and the Neumann Laplace operator, is discussed in more detail in [2 K. Akhlil, Locality and domination of semigroups. Results Math. 73, Paper No. 59 (2018) , Section 3]. The spectral bound of $A$ is negative, and the inverse $(−A)_{−1}$ can be computed explicitly [16 D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually and asymptotically positive semigroups on Banach lattices. J. Differential Equations 261, 2607–2649 (2016) , proof of Theorem 6.11 (i)]; from this formula and the spectral theory of positive operators, we can conclude that $s(A)$ is a simple eigenvalue and that there is a corresponding eigenfunction which is strictly positive on the closed interval $[0,1]$; see [16 D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually and asymptotically positive semigroups on Banach lattices. J. Differential Equations 261, 2607–2649 (2016) , Theorem 6.11] for details. Moreover, we have $e_{1⋅A}L_{2}(0,1)⊆dom(A)⊆L_{∞}(0,1)$, so the assumptions of Theorem 8 are satisfied for $u=1$, and we obtain the following result.

**Theorem 11**

**.**

*The semigroup $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ on $L_{2}(0,1)$ generated by the Laplace operator with the non-local boundary conditions given above is uniformly eventually positive.*

Compare also [4 S. Arora, R. Chill and J.-D. Djida, Domination of semigroups generated by regular forms. arXiv:2111.15489v1 (2021) , Section 4.2] for a related discussion. An example of eventual positivity for different non-local boundary conditions which lead to a non-self-adjoint realisation of the Laplace operator can be found in [14 D. Daners and J. Glück, A criterion for the uniform eventual positivity of operator semigroups. Integral Equations Operator Theory 90, Paper No. 46 (2018) , Theorem 4.3].

### Further examples

Today, eventual positivity, and closely related properties as for instance *asymptotic positivity*, are known for various further $C_{0}$-semigroups, including the semigroup generated by the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on the unit circle for various parameter choices [12
D. Daners, Non-positivity of the semigroup generated by the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator.
Positivity 18, 235–256 (2014)
] (which was the initial motivation for the development of the general theory), several delay differential equations ([17
D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually positive semigroups of linear operators.
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 433, 1561–1593 (2016)
, Section 6.5], [24
J. Glück, Invariant sets and long time behaviour of operator semigroups.
PhD thesis, Universität Ulm (2016)
, Section 11.6] and [14
D. Daners and J. Glück, A criterion for the uniform eventual positivity of operator semigroups.
Integral Equations Operator Theory 90, Paper No. 46 (2018)
, Theorem 4.6]), the semigroup generated by a bi-Laplacian with certain Wentzell boundary conditions [19
R. Denk, M. Kunze and D. Ploß, The bi-Laplacian with Wentzell boundary conditions on Lipschitz domains.
Integral Equations Operator Theory 93, Paper No. 13 (2021)
, Section 7], various semigroups on metric graphs ([26
F. Gregorio and D. Mugnolo, Higher-order operators on networks: hyperbolic and parabolic theory.
Integral Equations Operator Theory 92, Paper No. 50 (2020)
, Proposition 3.7], [25
F. Gregorio and D. Mugnolo, Bi-Laplacians on graphs and networks.
J. Evol. Equ. 20, 191–232 (2020)
, Section 6] and [8
S. Becker, F. Gregorio and D. Mugnolo, Schrödinger and polyharmonic operators on infinite graphs: parabolic well-posedness and p-independence of spectra.
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 495, Paper No. 124748 (2021)
, Proposition 5.5]) and semigroups generated by Laplacians coupled by point interactions [28
A. Hussein and D. Mugnolo, Laplacians with point interactions – expected and unexpected spectral properties.
In Semigroups of operators – theory and applications, Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 325, Springer, Cham, 47–67 (2020)
, Proposition 2].

## 5 Unbounded domains and local properties

### The biharmonic heat equations on unbounded domains

A major drawback of Theorem 8 is that it can only be applied if the leading spectral value is even an eigenvalue of the operator $A$. This makes it impossible to apply the theorem to various differential operators that live on unbounded domains. For instance, consider the biharmonic operator $A$ on $L_{2}(R_{d})$ given by

The spectrum of $A$, which is the set $(−∞,0]$, does not contain eigenvalues, so Theorem 8 cannot be applied. Still, the semigroup $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ exhibits a certain local eventual positivity property: for every compact set $K⊆R_{d}$ and every initial value $0≤u_{0}∈L_{2}(R_{d})∩L_{1}(R_{d})$, the solution $u:t↦e_{tA}u_{0}$ to the biharmonic heat equation $u˙(t)=Au(t)$ becomes eventually positive on $K$. This was proved, under slightly different assumptions on $u_{0}$ in [23 F. Gazzola and H.-C. Grunau, Eventual local positivity for a biharmonic heat equation in ℝn. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 1, 83–87 (2008) , Theorem 1 (i)] and [22 A. Ferrero, F. Gazzola and H.-C. Grunau, Decay and eventual local positivity for biharmonic parabolic equations. , Theorem 1.1 (ii)] by explicit kernel estimates; for more general powers of $Δ$, a similar result was recently shown in [21 L. C. F. Ferreira and V. A. Ferreira, Jr., On the eventual local positivity for polyharmonic heat equations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 147, 4329–4341 (2019) , Theorem 1.1]. Under the assumptions described above, the result was proved by Fourier transform methods in [18 D. Daners, J. Glück and J. Mui, Local uniform convergence and eventual positivity of solutions to biharmonic heat equations. arXiv:2111.02753v1 (2021) , Theorem 2.1].

If we replace the whole space $R_{d}$ with an infinite cylinder – for instance of the form $R×B$, where $B⊆R_{d−1}$ is a ball – and again impose clamped plate boundary conditions, the same local eventual positivity result remains true. The proof is technically more involved, though, and relies on a detailed analysis of the specific partial differential equation under consideration; see [18 D. Daners, J. Glück and J. Mui, Local uniform convergence and eventual positivity of solutions to biharmonic heat equations. arXiv:2111.02753v1 (2021) , Theorem 2.3 and Section 4].

However, despite the successful analysis of the aforementioned concrete differential equations, an abstract and general theory as outlined in Section 3 for operators with leading eigenvalue is not yet in sight for the case without eigenvalues.

**Open problem****.** Develop a theory of locally eventually positive $C_{0}$-semigroups $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ which is applicable in situations where the generator $A$ does not have a leading eigenvalue.

### Eigenvalues revisited

Getting back to operators which do have a leading eigenvalue, results such as Theorem 8 might still not be applicable in some cases due to conditions (1) and (2) which are sometimes particularly subtle at the boundary of $Ω$ (if $Ω$ is, say, a domain in $R_{d}$ and $A$ a differential operator). When all functions are restricted to compact subsets of $Ω$, though, conditions of the type (1) and (2) might still be satisfied.

This motivates the development of a theory of locally eventually positive semigroups for generators that do have a leading eigenvalue with strictly positive eigenfunction. Such a theory was presented by Arora in [3 S. Arora, Locally eventually positive operator semigroups. J. Oper. Theory, to appear ]. An application of the theory to certain fourth order operators with unbounded coefficients on $R_{d}$ (which sometimes have eigenvalues due to the growth of the coefficients) was given in [1 D. Addona, F. Gregorio, A. Rhandi and C. Tacelli, Bi-Kolmogorov type operators and weighted Rellich’s inequalities. arXiv:2104.03811v1 (2021) , Section 3.2].

## 6 Related topics and results

We close the article by discussing a few related concepts.

### Perturbation theory

If $A$ generates a positive $C_{0}$-semigroup on a function space $E$, it is quite easy to see that if $B$ is a positive and bounded linear operator on $E$ and $M$ is a bounded and real-valued multiplication operator on $E$, then the perturbed semigroup $(e_{t(A+B+M)})_{t∈[0,∞)}$ is positive, too: if $M=0$, this follows for instance from the so-called *Dyson–Phillips series representation* of perturbed semigroups [20
K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations.
Grad. Texts in Math. 194, Springer, New York (2000)
, Theorem III.1.10], and if $M$ is non-zero, it follows from the previous case by using the formula

for a real number $c≥0$ that is sufficiently large to ensure that $M+cid$ is positive.

For eventual positivity, though, the situation is much more subtle. Under quite general conditions, one can show that eventual positivity of a semigroup cannot be preserved by all positive perturbations of the generator. This was proved in [15 D. Daners and J. Glück, Towards a perturbation theory for eventually positive semigroups. J. Operator Theory 79, 345–372 (2018) , Theorem 2.3]; related results in finite dimensions had earlier been obtained in [32 F. Shakeri and R. Alizadeh, Nonnegative and eventually positive matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 519, 19–26 (2017) , Theorem 3.5 and Proposition 3.6]. On the other hand, sufficiently small positive perturbations can be shown not to destroy eventual positivity under appropriate assumptions [15 D. Daners and J. Glück, Towards a perturbation theory for eventually positive semigroups. J. Operator Theory 79, 345–372 (2018) , Section 4].

### Maximum and anti-maximum principles

One abstract way to formulate that a linear operator $A:E⊇dom(A)→E$ on a function space $E$ satisfies a *maximum principle* is to require that $(−A)_{−1}$ be a positive operator, i.e. maps positive functions to positive functions.
If $0$ is in the spectrum of $E$, or more generally if the spectral bound of $A$ satisfies $s(A)≥0$, it is often more natural to consider the *resolvent*$(λid−A)_{−1}$ for real numbers $λ>s(A)$.
If the resolvent at one such point $λ_{0}$ is positive, then the same is true for all $λ∈(s(A),λ_{0})$, too, and we say that $A$ satisfies a *maximum principle*.
More precisely, this is a *uniform* maximum principle, while we say that $A$ satisfies an *individual maximum principle* if, for each $0≤f∈E$, there exists an ($f$-dependent) number $λ_{0}>s(A)$ such that $(λid−A)_{−1}f≥0$ for all $λ∈(s(A),λ_{0})$.

Similarly, it is common to say that $A$ satisfies a *uniform anti-maximum principle* if $s(A)$ is, say, an isolated spectral value and for all $λ$ in a left neighbourhood of $s(A)$ the resolvent $(λid−A)_{−1}$ maps positive functions to negative functions.
Likewise, we can define an *individual anti-maximum principle* (and clearly, the same concepts can be defined at isolated spectral values different from $s(A)$, too).

Anti-maximum principles have a considerable history and have, for instance, been studied for various elliptic differential operators; see e.g. [10 P. Clément and L. A. Peletier, An anti-maximum principle for second-order elliptic operators. J. Differential Equations 34, 218–229 (1979) ] for a seminal paper on this topic. For biharmonic and polyharmonic operators the validity of (anti-)maximum principles is closely related to the boundary conditions and the geometry of the underlying domain, as explained in Remark 10.

The argument sketched after Theorem 9 can be generalised (and partially reversed) to obtain a correspondence between the following three types of properties:

eventual positivity of the semigroup $(e_{tA})_{t∈[0,∞)}$,

spectral properties of $A$ and positivity of the leading eigenfunction,

an individual (anti-)maximum principle for $A$.

This correspondence was discussed in [16
D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually and asymptotically positive semigroups on Banach lattices.
J. Differential Equations 261, 2607–2649 (2016)
, Sections 3–5], where the terminology *eventual positivity and negativity of the resolvent* was used to describe maximum and anti-maximum principles.
Indeed, equivalence between the three properties (a)–(c) is true under a number of technical restrictions which have been analysed in more detail in [13
D. Daners and J. Glück, The role of domination and smoothing conditions in the theory of eventually positive semigroups.
Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 96, 286–298 (2017)
].

Uniform (anti-)maximum principles are more difficult to analyse than their individual counterparts – a phenomenon that occurs, as pointed out above, for semigroups, too, but becomes even more pronounced when studying (anti-)maximum principles. An abstract operator theoretic approach to uniform anti-maximum principles was first presented by Takáč in [34 P. Takáč, An abstract form of maximum and anti-maximum principles of Hopf’s type. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 201, 339–364 (1996) , Section 5], and recent progress on the topic was made in [7 S. Arora and J. Glück, An operator theoretic approach to uniform (anti-)maximum principles. J. Differential Equations 310, 164–197 (2022) ]. As a sample result, let us discuss the following special case of [7 S. Arora and J. Glück, An operator theoretic approach to uniform (anti-)maximum principles. J. Differential Equations 310, 164–197 (2022) , Corollary 5.4] for self-adjoint operators on $L_{2}$.

**Theorem 12**

**.**

*Let $(Ω,μ)$ be a $σ$-finite measure space, and let $A:L_{2}⊇dom(A)→L_{2}$ be a real and self-adjoint operator on $L_{2}:−L_{2}(Ω,μ)$.
Let $u∈L_{2}$ be a function which is $>0$ almost everywhere, and assume that there exists an integer $m≥0$ such that every vector in $dom(A_{m})$ is dominated in modulus by a multiple of $u$.
Assume moreover that $λ_{0}∈R$ is an isolated spectral value of $A$ and a simple eigenvalue whose eigenspace contains a function $v$ that satisfies $v≥cu$ for a number $c>0$.*

*If $μ_{1}>λ_{0}$ is in the resolvent set of $A$ and $(μ_{1}id−A)_{−1}≥0$, then the following assertions are equivalent.*

*One has*$(μid−A)_{−1}≤0$*for all*$μ$*in a left neighbourhood of*$λ_{0}$*.**There exists a real number*$d>0$*such that*$(μ_{1}id−A)_{−1}f≤d⟨f,u⟩ufor all0≤f∈L_{2}.$

The assumption that $A$ be a *real operator* means that the domain $dom(A)$ is spanned by real-valued functions and that $A$ maps real-valued functions to real-valued functions.
Assertion (i) of the theorem is a uniform anti-maximum principle, while assertion (ii) can be considered as an upper kernel estimate for the resolvent (in other words: as an upper Green function estimate) of $A$.
Simple consequences of this theorem are the classical results that the Dirichlet Laplace operator on an interval does not satisfy a uniform anti-maximum principle, while the Neumann Laplace operator on an interval does (see [7
S. Arora and J. Glück, An operator theoretic approach to uniform (anti-)maximum principles.
J. Differential Equations 310, 164–197 (2022)
, Proposition 6.1 (a) and (b)] for a few more details).
More involved examples where the theorem (or more general versions thereof) can be applied are discussed in [7
S. Arora and J. Glück, An operator theoretic approach to uniform (anti-)maximum principles.
J. Differential Equations 310, 164–197 (2022)
, Section 6].

## References

- D. Addona, F. Gregorio, A. Rhandi and C. Tacelli, Bi-Kolmogorov type operators and weighted Rellich’s inequalities. arXiv:2104.03811v1 (2021)
- K. Akhlil, Locality and domination of semigroups. Results Math. 73, Paper No. 59 (2018)
- S. Arora, Locally eventually positive operator semigroups. J. Oper. Theory, to appear
- S. Arora, R. Chill and J.-D. Djida, Domination of semigroups generated by regular forms. arXiv:2111.15489v1 (2021)
- S. Arora and J. Glück, Spectrum and convergence of eventually positive operator semigroups. Semigroup Forum 103, 791–811 (2021)
- S. Arora and J. Glück, Stability of (eventually) positive semigroups on spaces of continuous functions. arXiv:2110.04581v1 (2021)
- S. Arora and J. Glück, An operator theoretic approach to uniform (anti-)maximum principles. J. Differential Equations 310, 164–197 (2022)
- S. Becker, F. Gregorio and D. Mugnolo, Schrödinger and polyharmonic operators on infinite graphs: parabolic well-posedness and p-independence of spectra. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 495, Paper No. 124748 (2021)
- T. Boggio, Sulle funzioni di Green d’ordine m. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 20, 97–135 (1905)
- P. Clément and L. A. Peletier, An anti-maximum principle for second-order elliptic operators. J. Differential Equations 34, 218–229 (1979)
- A. Dall’Acqua and G. Sweers, On domains for which the clamped plate system is positivity preserving. In Partial differential equations and inverse problems, Contemp. Math. 362, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 133–144 (2004)
- D. Daners, Non-positivity of the semigroup generated by the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. Positivity 18, 235–256 (2014)
- D. Daners and J. Glück, The role of domination and smoothing conditions in the theory of eventually positive semigroups. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 96, 286–298 (2017)
- D. Daners and J. Glück, A criterion for the uniform eventual positivity of operator semigroups. Integral Equations Operator Theory 90, Paper No. 46 (2018)
- D. Daners and J. Glück, Towards a perturbation theory for eventually positive semigroups. J. Operator Theory 79, 345–372 (2018)
- D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually and asymptotically positive semigroups on Banach lattices. J. Differential Equations 261, 2607–2649 (2016)
- D. Daners, J. Glück and J. B. Kennedy, Eventually positive semigroups of linear operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 433, 1561–1593 (2016)
- D. Daners, J. Glück and J. Mui, Local uniform convergence and eventual positivity of solutions to biharmonic heat equations. arXiv:2111.02753v1 (2021)
- R. Denk, M. Kunze and D. Ploß, The bi-Laplacian with Wentzell boundary conditions on Lipschitz domains. Integral Equations Operator Theory 93, Paper No. 13 (2021)
- K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations. Grad. Texts in Math. 194, Springer, New York (2000)
- L. C. F. Ferreira and V. A. Ferreira, Jr., On the eventual local positivity for polyharmonic heat equations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 147, 4329–4341 (2019)
- A. Ferrero, F. Gazzola and H.-C. Grunau, Decay and eventual local positivity for biharmonic parabolic equations.
- F. Gazzola and H.-C. Grunau, Eventual local positivity for a biharmonic heat equation in ℝn. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 1, 83–87 (2008)
- J. Glück, Invariant sets and long time behaviour of operator semigroups. PhD thesis, Universität Ulm (2016)
- F. Gregorio and D. Mugnolo, Bi-Laplacians on graphs and networks. J. Evol. Equ. 20, 191–232 (2020)
- F. Gregorio and D. Mugnolo, Higher-order operators on networks: hyperbolic and parabolic theory. Integral Equations Operator Theory 92, Paper No. 50 (2020)
- H.-C. Grunau and G. Sweers, The maximum principle and positive principal eigenfunctions for polyharmonic equations. In Reaction diffusion systems (Trieste, 1995), Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. 194, Dekker, New York, 163–182 (1998)
- A. Hussein and D. Mugnolo, Laplacians with point interactions – expected and unexpected spectral properties. In Semigroups of operators – theory and applications, Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 325, Springer, Cham, 47–67 (2020)
- D. Noutsos and M. J. Tsatsomeros, Reachability and holdability of nonnegative states. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30, 700–712 (2008)
- E. M. Ouhabaz, Analysis of heat equations on domains. London Math. Soc. Monogr. Ser. 31, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2005)
- A. Pazy, Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations. Appl. Math. Sci. 44, Springer, New York (1983)
- F. Shakeri and R. Alizadeh, Nonnegative and eventually positive matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 519, 19–26 (2017)
- G. Sweers, When is the first eigenfunction for the clamped plate equation of fixed sign? In Proceedings of the USA-Chile Workshop on Nonlinear Analysis (Viña del Mar-Valparaiso, 2000), Electron. J. Differ. Equ. Conf. 6, Southwest Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX, 285–296 (2001)
- P. Takáč, An abstract form of maximum and anti-maximum principles of Hopf’s type. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 201, 339–364 (1996)
- H. Vogt, Stability of uniformly eventually positive C0-semigroups on Lp-spaces. arXiv:2110.02310v2 (2021)

## Cite this article

Jochen Glück, Evolution equations with eventually positive solutions. Eur. Math. Soc. Mag. 123 (2022), pp. 4–11

DOI 10.4171/MAG/65